1. If in an academic field equivocation is legal we can safely call that field an academic scholastic field.
   
2. Here’s an example, this guy is based his research in proving that nothing is something.
   

that zero might have evolved from a more fundamental ability to grasp the idea that “nothing” really is “something.”

3. Which simply means that he is trying to define the word nothing both as nothing and as something.
   

1. Can we make any new discoveries by using equivocal or undefined words?
   
2. I think we can only create confusion.