Table of Contents

Kepler’s Rule - Real cause

THE REAL CAUSE OF KEPLER’S RULE

  1. we know that Newton’s fairy tale explanation with non-existent supernatural causes is not true
  2. if so what is the correct cause of Kepler’s Rule
  3. think analytically
  4. we know that what we call gravity the fall of the stone is not due to the supernatural, occult, mysterious and absurd cause Newton calls force.
  5. According the Newtonian explanation the earth pulls the stone. This supernatural cause called force residing at the center of the of the earth reaches out to the stone and pulls the stone toward the center
  6. but even this explanation is not totally correct. We need to make several rationalizations. First, according to Newton’s fairy tale the attraction is mutual. Furthermore, the earth and the stone mutually attract each other but there is no attraction. Newton vehemently denies that he believes in attraction at a distance. So, Newtonian sophistry reaches gooey levels and becomes very ugly.
  7. so clearly there is no force of any kind attracting the stone. The motion of the stone is purely change in motion, is pure acceleration. In an accelerating plane, passengers feel a “pull” as if a mass located at the rear of the plane attracting them towards the rear. This must be the Newtonian explanation of acceleration.
  8. But we cannot directly project this acceleration to the acceleration on earth.
  9. we already have g, acceleration due to gravity or acceleration we call gravity
  10. so measure gravity as acceleration not as force
  11. and Newtonian force never enters calculations relating to gravity because it always cancels
  12. but the earth is not a plane. The plane moves on a straight line. The earth rotates.
  13. What can cause this acceleration?
  14. I think the circular, rather spherical, motion of the earth causes this motion. But how do we define circular motion.
  15. spherical motion
  16. chatgpt’ye sordum biraz bilgi verdi
  17. I can also ask what I’m really trying to do
  18. I dismiss Newton’s force as a supernatural cause. Newton’s force is supernatural because it travels distances without time passing. Newton tries to hide this by claiming that he is only studying this supernatural cause “mathematically”. This does not make sense to me. But this is a different subject.
  19. Now let’s assume that it is true that Newton’s force is a supernatural cause and it cannot be used to describa natural phenomena such as orbital motion.
  20. Then, we need to find a different cause for orbital motion.
  21. We know that there is only one rule that describes orbital motion and this is Kepler’s Rule. There is no other rule. If we want to compute orbits we have three choices: 1) use astronomical tables, 2) trigonometric formulas, 3) use Kepler’s Rule. Newton too is using Kepler’s Rule but he labels the terms of Kepler’s Rule with his force.
  22. In other words if we deny Newton’s force, we need to explain the fall of the stone and the motion of the moon without invoking Newton’s force. This leaves us only one choice: what we call gravity is acceleration. Pure aceleration analogous to the acceleration we feel in an accelerating airplane.
  23. Here we also look at the so-called equivalence principle. Since gravity is not force, there is no equivalence there is only acceleration. Einstein’s reasoning do not make sense.
  24. But the analogy between the acceleration in an acceleration airplane and the acceleration on earth is not perfect.
  25. The acceleration on earth is three dimensional. The stone falls toward the center from all positions on the spherical earth. This means that Earth’s rotation cannot cause the same acceleration everywhere on earth. On the equator we would get a perceptible difference. But we don’t observe this.
  26. There is also the earth’s motion around the sun.
  27. And there is the issue of why celestial objects are mostly spherical. This too is explained by invoking Newton’s force or “Newton’s laws”.
  28. Do we have a relation why the earth spherical and Kepler’s Rule?
  29. For instance, in weightless environment liquids form into spheres. This is explained by surface tension.
  30. We may imagine that the earth and all other spherical objects were balls of fires, or liquid magma and therefore in space where there is no favored direction these liquid balls fireballs formed themselves into spheres.
  31. But this too does not explain why there is motion towards the center
  32. This is why I was trying to explore this analogy. In one dimensional acceleration we have linear acceleration in the contrary direction of the motion. This is said to be caused by inertia.
  33. In two dimensional acceleration we have a tendency to escape outward. We observe this in the motion of a sling.
  34. Then we have the three dimensional acceleration and this time accelaration is directed toward the center. This must be due to the geometry of space
  35. So the assumption is that the acceleration of the falling stone is caused by the spherical motion of the earth. All we need find is how. Very simple.

Kepler’s Rule is related to density

  1. We can assume that Newton’s force is supernatural and it does not exist therefore it cannot be used in explaining orbits.
  2. We can assume this and try to find the real cause of Kepler’s Rule
  3. What do we mean by the real cause of Kepler’s Rule?
  4. But we need to understand the official Newtonian explanation or Newtonian spohistry.

Created: 2025-03-03 Mon 17:15

Validate