Table of Contents
Timeless travel
Definition
- I call “timeless travel” the ability to travel distances without time passing.
- Timeless travel is the defining property of Newton’s force. This force forms orbits by bending straight lines into circles and then powers the orbit by interacting with the orbiting body. Newton’s force achieves all these supernatural feats by traveling timelessly. Newton’s force is everywhere at once. In physics the unit of being everywhere at once is called “Newton”.
- There is an absurdity here. Speed is defined as \[s=\frac{d}{t}\].
- But in timeless travel we have \[s=\frac{d}{}\]
- In timeless travel \(t\) is not zero nor does it have any other value, it just does not exist in the formulas, that’s what “timeless” mean.
- And Newton the greatest sophist and self-promoting scientific fraud ever lived was able to sell this timeless travel as a physical thing and his disciples still protect Newton’s lame definition of speed by using slimy and slippery tricks of rhetorical sophistry.
- I think calling Newton’s force “supernatural” does not make justice to Newton’s fame, we ought to call it a fairy tale force.
Is timeless travel possible?
- I assume that the statement that timeless travel is supernatural and does not exist in this world is as true as the impossibility of building perpetual motion machines.
- Timeless travel, if it were possible, would break all known laws of physics.
Would physicists agree that timeless travel is a fairy tale?
- I believe not. For two reasons. Physicists are disciples of Newton, for them Newton can never be wrong. Yes, he can be trivially wrong but never fundamentally wrong. Second, physicists are scholastic doctors of philosophy, They have the authority to argue by authority and they do.
- Physicists diluted even the principle of the impossibility of building perpetual motion machines. Scholastic doctors hate Aristotelian logic and abhor binary statements. They must always dilute any principle by subdividing it. This is the classic scholastic method of making a career. Scholastic doctors make their careers by subdividing a concept in order to appropriate it by associating their own labels with that concept. This concept is so ingrained in scholasticism that Newton accused Leibniz of doing this same thing while it was actually Newton who was a master of appropriation by renaming. If the majority of your colleagues accept your new word and start using it you gain professional points and the doors of famehood will be opened for you. So, physicists subdivided the principle of the impossibility of building perpetual motion machines by defining several types of it, like perpetual machine of the first kind and the second kind and so on. There is no limit of how deep a physicist can divide a topic.
- In the case of the timeless travel the same scholastic subdividing can be applied and we would end up with timeless travel of the first kind and timeless travel of the second kind and so on.
- Then the physicist will have fun arguing if timeless travel of the first kind is impossible or the singularities produced by the timeless travel of the second kind can be normalized and re-normalized until they are swept under the theoretical rug. Or, timeless travel of the Newtonian kind may be possible blah, blah, blah…
- According to General Relativity, a timeless travel in a certain suitable spacetime with certain suitable lambda and with certain suitable Big Bang model suitably renormalized may allow certain types of timeless travel. Academic physics is so much fun. This is why I proposed dividing physics into two branches, in analogy to art: applied physics and fine physics. In fine physics, beauty and elegance take precedence, theoretical freedom reigns, and empirical constraints are disregarded.
- I don’t care about the scholastic ruminations and hairsplitting of physicists. To me unless we observe timeless travel we must say that timeless travel is impossible. But in scholasticism anything and evrything is possible because there is an infinite supply of sophistry in scholasticism.
Travel means speed
- Travel, change of position, does not make sense without speed.
- Speed is distance divided by time: \(s=d/t\).
- Here time has nothing to do with the philosophical Time with a capital T.
- As in all ratios, here the consequent \(t\) is the scaling unit. I might as well state time as length
- To travel you must have speed. Speed is given by \(s=d/t\). Here \(t\) is the unit we count in \(d\). Here, time \(t\) has nothing to do with the philosophical Time.
- In this ratio, (or rate?) as the antecedent increases (travel occurs) the consequent (whatever its name is, in this case \(t\)) must also increase.
- If \(d\) increases and \(t\) stays constant speed makes no sense.
- Or, if \(d\) increases but \(t\) is zero, then we have a division by zero which makes no sense. In rational systems and in mathematics, division by zero is undefined.
- In the case of Newton’s occult force, the force travels the distance \(d\) but the cnosequent remains unchanged. This is irrational.
- I know that physicists have the authority to rationalize any irrationality by their sophistical arguments. Let them normalize this absurd timeless travel of Newton’s supernatural force. They will only look more foolish than they are now.
Time is the unit length
- We are dividing the distance traveled into equal parts and we define the scale with the consequent. The name we give to the consequent is irrelevant.
- It seems that here physicists, as usual, reified a name they gave to a magnitude. All magnitudes are lengths. The name we give to length do not matter.