Table of Contents

Force

I dismiss Newton’s force outright

  1. The reason is simple: Newton did not use force when he calculated orbits.
  2. It’s hard to understand how easily people believe Newton’s lies, his self-promotions, and self-propaganda.
  3. This is very simple.
  4. The force that Newton claimed to have discovered, the force of gravity, is, by definition, repeat, by definition, acts without time passing. This fact eliminates Newton’s force from physics because in this world of ours nothing can act without time passing. I don’t see any reason at all why nature should make an exception to Newton’s force so that it can act without time passing. Yes, Newton’s disciples define their grand priest of mechanics as the human closest to gods. But I still don’t see why gods should disrupt nature’s order just to make Newton happy. And we do not observe anything acting without time passing.
  5. Since nature is not supernatural and Newton’s force is supernatural then Newton’s force exist only in Newton’s own Wonderland.
  6. But Newton was a genius, the greatest evil genius ever passed through this earth. Newton was a master of every rhetorical trick in the book of scholasticism. He used rhetorical sophistry, he used equivocation and tricks we are not even aware of.
  7. Newton’s genius was to make the world believe that Newton’s force must exist because Newton use his force to compute planetary orbits. This is a lie.
  8. Newton’s Principia is masterpiece of Newtonian propaganda imposing on nature Newton’s atomic materialist dogma through his Cult of the Vis.
  9. Supposedly Newton defines a System of the World based on hiss supernatural force.
  10. But there is no coherent system of the world in the Principia. Newton uses Kepler’s Rule to compute some orbital parameters. That’s all. He never uses his force to compute orbits.
  11. In the Principia there only [x] propositions where Newton computes orbits. None of these proposition use a term for force to compute orbits simply because Kepler’s Rule computes orbits without force. According to Kepler’s Rule orbits are kinematic, not dynamical as Newton claims.
  12. Yes, in these propositions Newton uses the word “force” as decoy to deceive us into believing that he is using force to compute orbits. Don’t ever take Newton’s word for anything. Just look at what Newton does. Does he use a force term to compute orbits. No. Then Newton is lying.
  13. When it comes time to compute orbits Newton eliminates the force terms and uses Kepler’s Rule plain and simple. This is how Newton’s disciples still pretend to compute orbits. They write the F terms as a prayer to Newton then they eliminate them.
  14. You don’t need a force term to compute orbits. Kepler’s Rule contains only a term for the period and radius. This proves that orbits are kinematic.
  15. But Newtonism, the cult of the force, or The Cult of the Vis, where Newton’s force permeates the whole universe and it is the cause of everything. We know the force, or the Soul of Newton permeates the universe because it sets everything in motion without time passing and without having motion itself. Such a supernatural “thing” can only prescribed by gods for their favorite son Newton to discover.
  16. This occult and supernatural Newtonian materialism is taught to us at school as the only true nature. That’s why we see non-existent forces all around us, like the force that pulls the falling stone to the center of the earth. So, Newtonism is entrenched in humanity’s psyche even more so that Aristotelianism and it will never go away.
  17. People will believe in forces that never see just because Newton said so. No one will dare to question the most sacred authority of Newton who is our Hermes Tetramegistus

Two types of forces

  1. There are two types of forces
    1. contact forces (transfer of motion by contact)
    2. non-contact forces (transfer of motion without contact)
  2. Force is defined as a cause that creates or changes motion.
  3. Since new motion cannot be created and motion can only be transferred force cannot exist as a cause only motion can cause motion by transfer.
  4. So Newton’s force is not even supernatural. It is only a label. We can do physics without Newtonian force.
  5. We can use acceleration.
  6. But Newton defined acceleration as caused by force.
  7. Acceleration is caused by transfer of motion not by force.
  8. And there is Newton’s forceful explanation of orbits.

Newton’s occult force

  1. Newton’s force acts without time passing. This is by definition.
  2. But nothing happens in our world without time passing.
  3. Therefore Newton occult force does not exist in this world.
  4. Consequently planets are not held in orbit by Newton’s force. Why?
  5. Because Newton’s force does not exist in this world because it acts outside of time.

Geometry and Newton’s force

  1. Newton’s occult force cannot be represented geometrically
  2. Any relation needs to be represented by a line.
  3. So the tension on the string of the sling rotation can be represented with a line.
  4. But not Newton’s force because it is not a quantity, it does not enter any ratios.

Conatus

  1. Before force there was conatus.

Planets do not need an agent to hold them in orbit

  • This is the same mentality as the people who invented crystalline spheres because they believed that the planets will fall if not held in orbit
  • The great Newton freed humanity from this stupid idea and he made planets to be held by his occult force.
  • But wait. This is not true. Newton still believed that planets need to be held in place by something otherwise they will fly off along the tangent.
  • So Newton believed and Newton’s disciples the physicists still believe that some agent must hold planets in orbit or they would not stay in their orbit.
  • No. Nothing needs to hold planets in orbit. Orbits are inertial not dynamical.

“Centripetal force” is Newton’s name for the supernatural cause he invented

  1. In proposition I.6 Newton is trying to establish orbits powered by something he calls “centripetal force.” As usual Newton’s disciples accept Newton’s words as sacred and never question the real meaning of this “centripetal force”.
  2. In Prop. I.6 Newton proves nothing. Here’s a paper exposing Newton’s proof as pure garbage. But miraculously even after showing that Newton’s proof is garbage authors go ahead and offer their own proof to save Newton’s authority because whatever Newton says must be true and correct by definition.
  3. Prop. I.6 is another bullshit proof by Newton that his disciples have been trying hard to rationalize
  4. I have no intention of assuming that Newton is always right and then trying to fill in the logical gaps and fudging and lying by Newton. No. Newton’s proof of prop. 6 is nonsensical garbage to put it mildly.
  5. But what is more important is that any proposition in which Newton uses this “centripetal force” ploy is void. “Centripetal force” is a name Newton gave to his supernatural cause to hide the fact that he was using a supernatural cause to explain natural phenomena.
  6. I want to assert strictly this fact that what Newton calls “centripetal force” and never defines properly, is a supernatural cause that has no place in physics. Any proposition Newton uses the label “centripetal force” is null and void.
  7. We no longer admit supernatural causes into physics.
  8. We dismiss any attempt to explain natural phenomena with supernatural causes even if the offender is the human closest to God, the greatest scientist ever lived, our revered Moses of Mechanics, Sir Slippery Slick Isaac, the Doctor of Sophistry.
  9. I want to assert strictly this fact that what Newton calls “centripetal force” and never defines properly, is a supernatural cause that has no place in physics. Any proposition where Newton uses the label centripetal force that proposition will be null and void.
  10. Now enter one of Newton’s fanatic disciples and let him rationalize Newton’s supernatural cause called euphemistically “force”. “This force may be supernatural,” says the disciple, “and may be acting from a distance and creating new motion by violating all known conservation laws, but our Hermes Tetramagistus, the human closest to Gods, our Moses of Mechanics, Sir Isaac the Sophist, admits all this, but he uses this force to compute planetary orbits, therefore this force, even if supernatural, must exist.”
  11. This childish argument first offered by the greatest sophist of all times the Slick Sir Isaac is, yes, childish. If this force is supernatural by definition then it does not exist in this world and Newton could not have used it in his computations. Newton is lying. We know Newton is lying because unlike his disciples the people who call themselves physicists we actually opened the Principia and checked Newton’s computations in the greatest book ever written after the Bible and we saw that indeed Newton never uses any term for force centripetal or otherwise to compute orbits. Newton computes orbits by a simple application of Kepler’s Rule.

Created: 2025-03-10 Mon 14:49

Validate